Tag: progressive Christianity

Whenever there’s an election, I’m reminded of how little some sectors of the church have learned about the detrimental impact of polarising political statements made by churches and church leaders on the Gospel.

While I support Christians participating in politics or running for political office, the church as a whole—and pastors in particular—must remain above politics, nonpartisan, and committed to its central message: the good news of God’s love and grace through Jesus Christ. Anything that obscures that message is an enemy of the Gospel.

Too Political

Several years ago, the Barna Foundation commissioned research among young adults (ages 16-29) to determine why they did not engage with or had ceased to be involved in a church. One of the six reasons was that the church was “too political.”

I find it bewildering when church leaders make politically divisive statements, despite the evidence showing that this harms the cause of Christ. Sadly, we have observed a significant portion of the American church aligning politically, resulting in disturbing effects.

Conservatives Only?

A while ago, I saw a post on a pastor’s Facebook page encouraging his followers and congregation to “Let righteousness reign. Put Labor and the Greens last!” I realise this reflects the views of many conservative Christians, but my question is: what message does this send to people in that church who may disagree? What about people who do vote Labor or Green and still love Jesus? What about those in the broader community who are considering Jesus and the Church but are put off by this statement? Isn’t the Gospel inclusive, or do you have to change how you vote when you become a Christian? Also, why is it “righteous” to vote for a conservative party?

I don’t ask the people in our church who they vote for—it’s not my business—but I imagine we have all sorts of political perspectives at Bayside Church. Some of our members are conservative, while others have told me they’re voting for the Teals. Others are Green or Labor. People in our church are free to follow their conscience and vote accordingly. Our unity is found solely in the person of Jesus, whose kingdom is not of this world.

The Checklist

The aforementioned pastor shared the following chart compiled by the Australian Christian Values Institute.

The Christian Values Checklist informs voters about what each political party represents regarding various moral and ethical issues. The chart states, “On many welfare and social justice issues, the party policies are very similar. Our aim is to deal with the moral and ethical issues that are rarely, if ever, discussed publically [sic] in an election campaign.” I’ll return to that statement later.

The implication is that if you are a devoted Christian, you will likely vote for Family First, One Nation, or Trumpet of Patriots.

They Come and Go

In times past, the Australian Christian Values Institute has commended the Christian Democrats, the DLP, and Rise Up Australia. The Christian Democrats, Fred Nile’s party, were dissolved in 2022 by the courts due to longstanding legal challenges and governance issues. In the same year, the DLP (Democratic Labour Party) was deregistered because of a lack of members. Rise Up Australia was voluntarily deregistered by the Australian Electoral Commission in 2019. Rise Up’s leader, Danny Nalliah, has been surrounded by significant controversy for many years.

In 2025, we have some new parties to uphold “Christian values,” but if you can’t stomach any frontrunners, then the Nationals or the Libs would be your choice. However, whatever you do, “Let righteousness reign. Put Labor and the Greens last!”

Christian Values?

Let’s examine those Christian values. Predictably, they align with what one would expect from conservative Christianity in Australia, which has been significantly influenced by American Evangelicalism. In this tradition, the two main issues Christians should concentrate on are matters related to abortion and the LGBTQ+ community (stop both as much as you can).

While the chart helps you understand the various parties’ stances on these topics, I can’t help but notice the missing elements, which brings me back to the statement about welfare and social justice issues. Why separate these from a Christian Values Checklist?

Are refugees, the homeless, those living with mental illness, and victims of domestic violence not worthy of the Christian vote? Which party or parties have the best policies in place to help those on the margins of society? The chart includes nothing about those living in poverty, and it appears that the environment was added as an afterthought! Maybe I’m wrong, but is caring for God’s creation less critical than opening Parliament with a Christian prayer? And, on that topic, since when has it been a Christian value to force people to say a prayer if they don’t want to? Selah!

Jesus’ Example

For followers of Jesus Christ, He remains our example of Christian values. Jesus began and concluded His ministry with unequivocal value statements:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he has anointed me to bring Good News to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim that captives will be released, that the blind will see, that the oppressed will be set free, and that the time of the Lord’s favour has come.”

At the end of his earthly ministry, Jesus proclaimed that his followers would care for the hungry and thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick, and those in prison.

You’ll notice the overlap in Jesus’ statements. It seems His heart for those struggling in life didn’t change during His ministry years, and it still hasn’t.

As you vote in this or any election, consider what is important to you, but don’t stop there. What about others, especially those on the margins? The people for whom Jesus mainly showed concern. Paul put it this way, “Don’t look out only for your own interests, but take an interest in others, too.”

Jesus said, “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you.” Being like Jesus means we will be interested in the people He showed interest in, such as those who are homeless, sick, or in prison; the poor, orphans, and widows; as well as those living with disabilities or who are victims of domestic violence.

Your vote should support candidates who implement policies that demonstrate care and concern for the most vulnerable members of our community, as well as for God’s creation.

A Final Word

The church and Christian leaders must remain non-partisan. The Gospel is good news for all people. The church does not thrive when in power; it’s not meant to rule nations or manipulate political systems. It’s intended to proclaim a message of reconciliation with a God who loves people and a Saviour who died and rose again to extend amazing grace. Let’s never lose this focus.

I’ve just had seven weeks off—my first long service leave in 32 years of leading Bayside Church. My time away included a break from social media. But that all changed on Monday, my first foray on Facebook for almost two months. And what greeted me? Numerous posts from Christian people who were outraged about the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics.

Now, it wasn’t the entire ceremony that got their goat; it was just one scene, an apparent mockery of Leonardo da Vinci’s painting of the Last Supper by, wait for it, drag queens.

Christian Outrage

Our history is rich with instances of Christian outrage. When I transitioned from atheism to following Jesus in the late 70s, I was a DJ on a commercial rock radio station. The Christians I encountered were outraged about Rock ‘n’ Roll being the ‘devil’s music.’ We were cautioned about backward masking and how the drums in songs could summon evil spirits. This influenced me for a while, and there was pressure from my church to leave my radio job and stop playing ‘that’ music. I resisted the pressure, and I’m grateful I did. Radio has been a rewarding career for me. When I established Bayside Church, I supported myself, my wife, and my family for many years by working on the radio, as the church couldn’t afford to pay me much.

The outrage has shifted through the years from the satanic panic of the 1980s to the New Age movement and various movies and works of art. In 1988, Martin Scorsese’s movie The Last Temptation of Christ caused an uproar from multiple churches. The commotion gave the film all the free publicity it needed, and people went to see what they weren’t supposed to see. If Christians had ignored it, the movie would have flopped.

The same happened with an artwork called Piss Christ, a 1987 photograph by the American artist and photographer Andres Serrano. It depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass tank of the artist’s urine. Due to the controversy, Serrano received death threats, hate mail and lost grants. What if Christians had used the photo as an example of the gospel and presented the good news of Jesus entering the mess of humanity? But all we did was complain.

Nothing’s Changed

What concerns me most is that our default mechanism often appears to be outrage. We hear or see something and go straight to anger rather than calmly investigating the facts. We need to strive for a Christlike response, one that is rooted in love and understanding.

If people had done that with Andres Serrano’s photo, they would have realised it was a protest by the artist, who was concerned that people wore the crucifix as a fashion accessory rather than acknowledging it as an instrument of torture and death. To quote his own words, “When you see it, you’re not horrified by it at all, but what it represents is the crucifixion of a man.” What if we had listened and asked and investigated rather than protested? Piss Christ would have made a tremendous springboard for Christians to share the gospel—the message people need to hear from us, the message Jesus told us to spread—but all they hear is us whining. However, we still need to learn the lesson, as evidenced by many complaints about the scene at the Olympic Opening this week.

Appropriate Outrage?

If we had just calmed down, asked questions and investigated the truth, we’d have discovered that the scene had nothing to do with da Vinci’s The Last Supper but was a nod to Greek mythology and the Greek god Dionysius, the god of celebration connected to the gods of Olympus from which the Olympic games were named. The ceremony’s artistic director, Thomas Jolly, said, “You will never find in me a desire to mock and denigrate anyone.” This underscores the importance of investigating the truth before reacting, as it could prevent unnecessary outrage.

So, what have outraged Christians achieved? Has anyone heard the good news about Jesus? Are people getting the message that God loves them and has reconciled them to himself? Not at all. All they hear is the same droning from Christians who get irritated when they don’t get their way. Our actions and attitudes are the opposite of Christlike behaviours and the teachings of Scripture. We must remember that our main goal as Christians is to become increasingly like Jesus and reflect his nature to the world he loves, the world he died to save. This should guide our response to controversial issues.

Paul’s Writings

Paul often used the Olympic games as examples of Christian living in his letters. (Consider 1 Corinthians 9:24-27; 1 Thessalonians 2:19-20; Galatians 5:7; Hebrews 12:1-3. There are many other references, and I encourage you to explore them).

And here’s the thing: There wasn’t a hint of outrage in anything Paul wrote about the Olympics of his day. Not once did he warn Christians not to attend the games, which were centred around pagan worship of foreign gods. Paul didn’t fume that all the athletes who competed in the games from 776 BC to 393 AD did so thoroughly naked. He did not complain that only men were allowed to attend the games. Women were banned. Paul’s tent-making in Corinth with Priscilla and Aquila likely was to build the athletes’ accommodation for the games. Maybe Paul was a fan.

But Emperor Theodosius changed all that in 393 AD by banning the games as a blasphemous pagan festival because he was a, you guessed it, Christian. The modern Olympics were resurrected in 1896 with clothed athletes.

Fun fact: the word gymnasium comes from the Greek word gymnos, which means “naked.” So, if you’re an outraged Christian and you go to a gym, you might like to reconsider.

Jesus Outrage

What made Jesus angry? It’s an essential question because it serves as a model for legitimate indignation.

Jesus was outraged by:

Jesus taught his followers the law of love: love God, love one another, love your enemy, and love your neighbour. He said to treat others as you would like them to treat you. He explained that when we feed the hungry, visit the sick or prisoners, and welcome the stranger, it’s as if we were doing those things for Jesus himself. These are the things the followers of Jesus are to be known for, and plenty of that is happening quietly and without fanfare.

But the world invariably hears our complaining, as it has once again heard this week. Our message is good news, and anything we do or say that detracts from the main message is an enemy of the gospel. How about we stop getting offended on Jesus’ behalf and get on with the incredible work he’s called us to?